Autore:
Malpassi, Stefano Titolo:
A che serve una storia delle opinioni separate? Alla ricerca di alcuni sentieri evolutivi nell'esperienza giuridica americanaPeriodico:
Politica del dirittoAnno:
2022 - Fascicolo:
3 - Pagina iniziale:
361 - Pagina finale:
378As Gilmore pointed out in 1977, judicial opinions are a fundamental tool for retracing the historical evolution of a legal system. The United States, and more specifically its Supreme Court, is, indeed, a pivotal «case study» in monitoring the impact of dissenting opinions on constitutional transformations during the 20th century, although judicial review itself has experienced different phases and has been employed for multifarious tasks. A study of dissenting opinions and social legislation during the Lochner Era offers an interesting perspective on the importance of dissent inside the Court for the survival and evolution of American democracy and constitutionalism. Finally, the «constitutional dialogue» here employed proves the relevance of channeling dissent through the Court
SICI: 0032-3063(2022)3<361:ACSUSD>2.0.ZU;2-O
Testo completo:
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1437/105011Testo completo alternativo:
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1437/105011Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)
Record salvabile in Zotero
Biblioteche ACNP che possiedono il periodico