In this paper I maintain that Guastini makes four reductions, and put forward my criticism to them. He reduces: (i) any value-free approach to law to the so-called methodological positivism; (ii) the legal positivism itself to the so-called methodological positivism; (iii) non-speculative legal philosophers to jurists; and (iv) all the realist legal philosophers to (methodological) positivists. My criticism is developed in sections 3b, 3a, 1, and 3c, respectively.
Nel rispetto della Direttiva 2009/136/CE, ti informiamo che il nostro sito utilizza i cookies. Se continui a navigare sul sito, accetti espressamente il loro utilizzo.