Autore:
Schauer, Frederick Titolo:
On the Nature of Legal Reasoning. Comments on a SymposiumPeriodico:
Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridicaAnno:
2017 - Fascicolo:
1 - Pagina iniziale:
277 - Pagina finale:
294This article is a response to four commentaries on the themes developed in "Thinking Like a Lawyer". Responding to Giovanni Battista Ratti, I acknowledge that analogical and precedential reasoning are often connected, but explain how and when they remain different. In response to Mauro Barberis, I develop further the distinction between the inapplicability of a rule and the overridability of an applicable one. In commenting on Jorge Rodriguez, I seek to explicate his analysis of defeasibility and burdens of proof. And in responding to Pierluigi Chiassoni, I focus on the distinction between hard and easy cases, and try to explain the premises on which such a distinction might depend.
SICI: 1120-9607(2017)1<277:OTNOLR>2.0.ZU;2-L
Testo completo:
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1436/86005Testo completo alternativo:
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1436/86005Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)
Record salvabile in Zotero
Biblioteche ACNP che possiedono il periodico