Autore:
Silvestri, Paolo Titolo:
Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics and Value JudgmentsPeriodico:
Università degli studi di Torino. Dip. Di Economia e Statistica Cognetti de Martiis. Working paper seriesAnno:
2015 - Volume:
9 - Fascicolo:
33 - Pagina iniziale:
1 - Pagina finale:
70The paper aims to address the following two questions: what kind of discourse is that
which attempt to found or defend the autonomy or the boundaries of a discipline? Why do such discourses tend to turn into normative, dogmatic-excommunicating discourses between disciplines, schools or scholars? I will argue that an adequate answer may be found if we conceive disciplines as dogmatics, where such discourses often take the form
of a discourse on the foundation of a discipline, a foundation in the name of which the scholar speaks and with which he/she entertains an identity relationship. To this purpose I will re-examine the methodological discourses of (and debates between)Pareto, Croce and Einaudi on the demarcation issue between philosophy, economics and value-judgments as highly instructive to understand such issues.
Testo completo:
http://www.est.unito.it/do/home.pl/Download?doc=/allegati/wp2015dip/wp_33_2015.pdfEsportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)
Record salvabile in Zotero