Autore
Pontara, GiulianoTitolo
Una difesa dell'utilitarismoPeriodico
Rivista di filosofiaAnno:
2008 - Volume:
0 - Fascicolo:
3 - Pagina iniziale:
467 - Pagina finale:
490In a number of books and articles written in Italian I have tried to defend classical (i.e. purely quantitative hedonistic, impersonal, total, act-) utilitarianism. In this paper it is argued that whether utilitarianism is formulated in terms of the (primitive) notions of right and wrong or, alternatively, in terms of the (primitive) notion of ultimate normative reasons for action, no substantive difference is made as to the matter of the viability of the doctrine. It is further stressed that what I have tried to defend is utilitarianism as a criterion of right action, not as a method of deliberation (this distinction being crucial), and that my defence of utilitarianism is premised on the methodological assumption that a viable ethical theory should cohere with our most considered judgments (Sidgwick's "rational intuitions"), and not with our "common moral intuitions". Finally, against preference utilitarianism it is argued that what morally matters is satisfying people, not satisfying their preferences.
SICI: 0035-6239(2008)0:3<467:UDD>2.0.ZU;2-9
Testo completo:
http://www.mulino.it/ws/rwDirectDownload.php?doi=10.1413/27767Testo completo alternativo:
http://www.mulino.it/rivisteweb/scheda_articolo.php?id_articolo=27767Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)
Record salvabile in Zotero
Biblioteche ACNP che possiedono il periodico