Autore
Schauer, Frederick

Titolo
On the Nature of Legal Reasoning. Comments on a Symposium
Periodico
Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica
Anno: 2017 - Fascicolo: 1 - Pagina iniziale: 277 - Pagina finale: 294

This article is a response to four commentaries on the themes developed in "Thinking Like a Lawyer". Responding to Giovanni Battista Ratti, I acknowledge that analogical and precedential reasoning are often connected, but explain how and when they remain different. In response to Mauro Barberis, I develop further the distinction between the inapplicability of a rule and the overridability of an applicable one. In commenting on Jorge Rodriguez, I seek to explicate his analysis of defeasibility and burdens of proof. And in responding to Pierluigi Chiassoni, I focus on the distinction between hard and easy cases, and try to explain the premises on which such a distinction might depend.



SICI: 1120-9607(2017)1<277:OTNOLR>2.0.ZU;2-L
Testo completo: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1436/86005
Testo completo alternativo: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1436/86005

Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)

Biblioteche ACNP che possiedono il periodico