We provide an epistemic analysis of forward induction in games with complete and incomplete information. We suggest that forward induction may be usefully interpreted as a set of assumptions governing thè players' belief revision processes, and define a notion of strong belief to formalize these assumptions. Building on thè notion of strong belief, we provide an epistemic characterization of extensive-form rationalizability and thè intuitive criterion, as well as sufficient epistemic conditions for thè backward induction outcome. We also investigate thè robustness of rationalizability to slight payoff uncertainity