Autore
Franchi, LeonardoTitolo
Considerazioni sulla presenza di Parmenide nel Sofista di Platone (Soph. 236 d -241 b )Periodico
La culturaAnno:
2020 - Fascicolo:
2/3 - Pagina iniziale:
177 - Pagina finale:
195According to what is commonly believed, Parmenides conceived the absolute Not-Being, in order to deny it by highlighting its being unthinkable. Plato, in turn, refused Parmenides’ position, by pointing out a way according to which a certain Not-Being is allowed to be and to be thought. A closer look at Plato’s Sophist, however, can point out a quite different scenario. Parmenides B 7. 1-2 DK, quoted by Plato, is not dealing with the absolute not Being (mhdamw'~ o[n ), but rather with several Not-Beings (mh; ejovnta). In addition, it is not declaring that Not-Beings cannot be thought, but rather that we should not think them as if they were Beings. This paper aims to focus on the difference between Plato’s mhdamw'~ o[n and Parmenides’ mh; ejovnta, in order to point out how Plato overturned Parmenides’ krivsi~ concerning e[sti and oujk e[sti, and how such an overturning led him, Plato, to his mhdamw'~ o[n .
SICI: 0393-1560(2020)2/3<177:CSPDPN>2.0.ZU;2-8
Testo completo:
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1403/99567Testo completo alternativo:
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1403/99567Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)
Record salvabile in Zotero
Biblioteche ACNP che possiedono il periodico