Autore
Bartolozzi, Giuseppe

Titolo
L'omooysioς nel III secolo. Note critiche sulla questione dei due Dionigi e il concilio di Antiochia del 268
Periodico
Cristianesimo nella storia
Anno: 2015 - Volume: 38 - Fascicolo: 3 - Pagina iniziale: 487 - Pagina finale: 504

It can be said that there are not valid reasons to assert that Dionisius of Alexandria'sadversaries were moderate Monarchians, who would have usedthe term 􀀃ὁμοoύσιoς􀀃 to deny somehow the subsistence to the Logos. Instead,such adversaries might be Alexandrian believers that had used 􀀃ὁμοoύσιoς􀀃 tostate that the Logos shared the Father's divinity, as shown by the examplesbrought forth by Dionisius of Alexandria, through which he interprets thetrinitarian use of the term. Concerning the eventuality of a sentence againstthe 􀀃ὁμοoύσιoς􀀃 in the council of Antioch of 268, with respect to the doctrineof Paul of Samosata, what is reported by Ilarius could be but a misunderstandingof what the Homoeousians wanted to assert appealing to the statementof that council, wich, against Paul's doctrine, had strengthened theconcept of subsistence of Logos using not only hypostasis but also ousia: the 􀀃ὁμοoύσιoς􀀃, intended by the Homoeousians as division of the paternal ousia,would have then compromised the statement that the Logos existed in hisown specific ousia.



SICI: 0393-3598(2015)38:3<487:LNISNC>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Testo completo: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.17395/82018
Testo completo alternativo: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.17395/82018

Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)

Biblioteche ACNP che possiedono il periodico