Autore
Esposito, ElenaTitolo
Observations on a Conversation: Reply to CommentaryPeriodico
SociologicaAnno:
2013 - Volume:
19 - Fascicolo:
2 - Pagina iniziale:
26 - Pagina finale:
30The very productive debate in Sociologica shows that second-order observation is notneeded to see more, but to see that one does not see, i.e. to see blindness. Reflexive blindnessreflects on itself and produces a different kind of insight, whose reference is not a supposedworld outside but the way observers observe.The debate highlights not only the blindness of finance, but also a certain blindness of thesociological observation of finance and even the blindness of observation theory itself. To see itcan become an advantage, if inserted in an ongoing conversation.
SICI: 1971-8853(2013)19:2<26:OOACRT>2.0.ZU;2-2
Testo completo:
http://www.mulino.it/download/article/10.2383/74855Testo completo alternativo:
http://www.mulino.it/doi/10.2383/74855Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)
Record salvabile in Zotero